Preseq performs a yield prediction by subsampling the reads, calculating the
number of distinct reads, and then extrapolating out to see where the
expected number of distinct reads no longer increases. The confidence interval
gives a gauge as to the validity of the yield predictions.
SAMstat (filtered/deduped BAM)
rep1
rep2
rep3
Total Reads
43233094
47471984
44663354
Total Reads (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Duplicate Reads
0
0
0
Duplicate Reads (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Mapped Reads
43233094
47471984
44663354
Mapped Reads (QC-failed)
0
0
0
% Mapped Reads
100.0
100.0
100.0
Paired Reads
43233094
47471984
44663354
Paired Reads (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Read1
21616547
23735992
22331677
Read1 (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Read2
21616547
23735992
22331677
Read2 (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Properly Paired Reads
43233094
47471984
44663354
Properly Paired Reads (QC-failed)
0
0
0
% Properly Paired Reads
100.0
100.0
100.0
With itself
43233094
47471984
44663354
With itself (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Singletons
0
0
0
Singletons (QC-failed)
0
0
0
% Singleton
0.0
0.0
0.0
Diff. Chroms
0
0
0
Diff. Chroms (QC-failed)
0
0
0
Filtered and duplicates removed
Fragment length statistics (filtered/deduped BAM)
rep1
rep2
rep3
Fraction of reads in NFR
0.4201124188445341
0.40703579997780504
0.33920748821447316
Fraction of reads in NFR (QC pass)
True
True
False
Fraction of reads in NFR (QC reason)
OK
OK
out of range [0.4, inf]
NFR / mono-nuc reads
1.4133775603956116
1.275601178690659
1.0741825974573367
NFR / mono-nuc reads (QC pass)
False
False
False
NFR / mono-nuc reads (QC reason)
out of range [2.5, inf]
out of range [2.5, inf]
out of range [2.5, inf]
Presence of NFR peak
True
True
True
Presence of Mono-Nuc peak
True
True
True
Presence of Di-Nuc peak
False
True
False
Open chromatin assays show distinct fragment length enrichments, as the cut
sites are only in open chromatin and not in nucleosomes. As such, peaks
representing different n-nucleosomal (ex mono-nucleosomal, di-nucleosomal)
fragment lengths will arise. Good libraries will show these peaks in a
fragment length distribution and will show specific peak ratios.
NFR: Nucleosome free region
Sequence quality metrics (filtered/deduped BAM)
Open chromatin assays are known to have significant GC bias. Please take this
into consideration as necessary.
Library complexity quality metrics
Library complexity (filtered non-mito BAM)
rep1
rep2
rep3
Total Fragments
35896109
42088536
38604077
Distinct Fragments
21624096
23749070
22339148
Positions with Two Read
4974174
5615727
5223428
NRF = Distinct/Total
0.602408
0.564265
0.578673
PBC1 = OneRead/Distinct
0.613597
0.576371
0.591068
PBC2 = OneRead/TwoRead
2.667473
2.43749
2.527832
Mitochondrial reads are filtered out by default.
The non-redundant fraction (NRF) is the fraction of non-redundant mapped reads
in a dataset; it is the ratio between the number of positions in the genome
that uniquely mapped reads map to and the total number of uniquely mappable
reads. The NRF should be > 0.8. The PBC1 is the ratio of genomic locations
with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic locations with AT LEAST one read
pair. PBC1 is the primary measure, and the PBC1 should be close to 1.
Provisionally 0-0.5 is severe bottlenecking, 0.5-0.8 is moderate bottlenecking,
0.8-0.9 is mild bottlenecking, and 0.9-1.0 is no bottlenecking. The PBC2 is
the ratio of genomic locations with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic
locations with EXACTLY two read pairs. The PBC2 should be significantly
greater than 1.
NRF (non redundant fraction)
PBC1 (PCR Bottleneck coefficient 1)
PBC2 (PCR Bottleneck coefficient 2)
PBC1 is the primary measure. Provisionally
0-0.5 is severe bottlenecking
0.5-0.8 is moderate bottlenecking
0.8-0.9 is mild bottlenecking
0.9-1.0 is no bottlenecking
rep1
rep2
rep3
Estimated library size by Picard tools
51306387.0
52261294.0
52860515.0
Replication quality metrics
IDR (Irreproducible Discovery Rate) plots
Reproducibility QC and peak detection statistics
overlap
idr
Nt
42349
3734
N1
5856
412
N2
55689
33284
N3
10074
612
Np
70058
29570
N optimal
70058
29570
N conservative
42349
3734
Optimal Set
pooled-pr1_vs_pooled-pr2
pooled-pr1_vs_pooled-pr2
Conservative Set
rep2_vs_rep3
rep2_vs_rep3
Rescue Ratio
1.6543011641361072
7.919121585431173
Self Consistency Ratio
9.509733606557377
80.7864077669903
Reproducibility Test
borderline
fail
Reproducibility QC
N1: Replicate 1 self-consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling Rep1 reads)
N2: Replicate 2 self-consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling Rep2 reads)
Ni: Replicate i self-consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling RepX reads)
Nt: True Replicate consistent peaks (comparing true replicates Rep1 vs Rep2)
Np: Pooled-pseudoreplicate consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling pooled reads from Rep1 and Rep2)
Self-consistency Ratio: max(N1,N2) / min (N1,N2)
Rescue Ratio: max(Np,Nt) / min (Np,Nt)
Reproducibility Test: If Self-consistency Ratio >2 AND Rescue Ratio > 2, then 'Fail' else 'Pass'
Number of raw peaks
rep1
rep2
rep3
Number of peaks
288126
186525
299145
Top 300000 raw peaks from macs2 with p-val threshold 0.01
Peak calling statistics
Peak region size
rep1
rep2
rep3
idr_opt
overlap_opt
Min size
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
25 percentile
73.0
98.0
73.0
521.0
227.0
50 percentile (median)
107.0
161.0
118.0
731.0
413.0
75 percentile
150.0
336.0
174.0
952.0
714.0
Max size
1644.0
2921.0
3044.0
2768.0
2768.0
Mean
123.97736754058988
299.51371665996516
142.03646726503868
749.1535339871491
501.4484855405521
Enrichment / Signal-to-noise ratio
Strand cross-correlation measures (filtered BAM)
rep1
rep2
rep3
Number of Subsampled Reads
25000000
25000000
25000000
Estimated Fragment Length
0
0
0
Cross-correlation at Estimated Fragment Length
0.191316493579889
0.196109422830772
0.191027316759835
Phantom Peak
145
145
145
Cross-correlation at Phantom Peak
0.1710109
0.1741907
0.1681984
Argmin of Cross-correlation
1500
1500
1500
Minimum of Cross-correlation
0.1687805
0.1684871
0.1659469
NSC (Normalized Strand Cross-correlation coeff.)
1.133522
1.163943
1.151135
RSC (Relative Strand Cross-correlation coeff.)
10.10419
4.842958
11.13934
Performed on subsampled (25000000) reads.
Such FASTQ trimming is for cross-corrleation analysis only.
Normalized strand cross-correlation coefficient (NSC) = col9 in outFile
Relative strand cross-correlation coefficient (RSC) = col10 in outFile
Estimated fragment length = col3 in outFile, take the top value
TSS enrichment (filtered/deduped BAM)
rep1
rep2
rep3
TSS enrichment
2.151712769672642
7.673244587898115
2.645575351127997
Open chromatin assays should show enrichment in open chromatin sites, such as
TSS's. An average TSS enrichment in human (hg19) is above 6. A strong TSS enrichment is
above 10. For other references please see https://www.encodeproject.org/atac-seq/
Jensen-Shannon distance (filtered/deduped BAM)
rep1
rep2
rep3
AUC
0.2939009061104606
0.2786092403384647
0.29447058560694483
Synthetic AUC
0.4954328533324549
0.4956766938789375
0.49562498909435554
X-intercept
0.14184049717658728
0.14519180010557803
0.13796530321693087
Synthetic X-intercept
0.0
0.0
0.0
Elbow Point
0.5195179402684241
0.5451446099211364
0.5216874890022876
Synthetic Elbow Point
0.4988443358215734
0.5024962976934453
0.5026287760685217
Synthetic JS Distance
0.23756391970389742
0.26616864400227414
0.23925791633341062
Peak enrichment
Fraction of reads in peaks (FRiP)
FRiP for macs2 raw peaks
rep1
rep2
rep3
rep1-pr1
rep2-pr1
rep3-pr1
rep1-pr2
rep2-pr2
rep3-pr2
pooled
pooled-pr1
pooled-pr2
Fraction of Reads in Peaks
0.08558545451315605
0.08867984114588512
0.0945070314244649
0.05663790536768405
0.0954512455177774
0.05253877473963219
0.05329061358831332
0.09778533797955442
0.06269260757678913
0.07690329899071299
0.08749009998165304
0.08114197795072275
FRiP for overlap peaks
rep1_vs_rep2
rep1_vs_rep3
rep2_vs_rep3
rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2
rep2-pr1_vs_rep2-pr2
rep3-pr1_vs_rep3-pr2
pooled-pr1_vs_pooled-pr2
Fraction of Reads in Peaks
0.01220396052160817
0.012022130831802794
0.016718528585748856
0.0035597035918826445
0.044300549983333326
0.007362904272706434
0.025427996388404647
FRiP for IDR peaks
rep1_vs_rep2
rep1_vs_rep3
rep2_vs_rep3
rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2
rep2-pr1_vs_rep2-pr2
rep3-pr1_vs_rep3-pr2
pooled-pr1_vs_pooled-pr2
Fraction of Reads in Peaks
0.0004898557146617462
0.0008711410648532887
0.0026659612929549187
0.0006166109693652738
0.03049404886890761
0.0020084698520402206
0.013349988422707001
For macs2 raw peaks:
repX: Peak from true replicate X
repX-prY: Peak from Yth pseudoreplicates from replicate X
pooled: Peak from pooled true replicates (pool of rep1, rep2, ...)
pooled-pr1: Peak from 1st pooled pseudo replicate (pool of rep1-pr1, rep2-pr1, ...)
pooled-pr2: Peak from 2nd pooled pseudo replicate (pool of rep1-pr2, rep2-pr2, ...)
For overlap/IDR peaks:
repX_vs_repY: Comparing two peaks from true replicates X and Y
repX-pr1_vs_repX-pr2: Comparing two peaks from both pseudoreplicates from replicate X
pooled-pr1_vs_pooled-pr2: Comparing two peaks from 1st and 2nd pooled pseudo replicates
Annotated genomic region enrichment
rep1
rep2
rep3
Fraction of Reads in universal DHS regions
0.38575055488742027
0.42670542271837636
0.3827142045803367
Fraction of Reads in blacklist regions
0.0026358973984142798
0.003536043490408996
0.0026451215464024487
Fraction of Reads in promoter regions
0.0216920861597368
0.05128188870302956
0.023350037706527816
Fraction of Reads in enhancer regions
0.3606073856291664
0.371091568450141
0.3559101942948575
Signal to noise can be assessed by considering whether reads are falling into
known open regions (such as DHS regions) or not. A high fraction of reads
should fall into the universal (across cell type) DHS set. A small fraction
should fall into the blacklist regions. A high set (though not all) should
fall into the promoter regions. A high set (though not all) should fall into
the enhancer regions. The promoter regions should not take up all reads, as
it is known that there is a bias for promoters in open chromatin assays.
Other quality metrics
Comparison to Roadmap DNase
This bar chart shows the correlation between the Roadmap DNase samples to
your sample, when the signal in the universal DNase peak region sets are
compared. The closer the sample is in signal distribution in the regions
to your sample, the higher the correlation.